Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chandini Sreedharan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nominator failed to advance a proper rationale for deletion and WP:BEFORE was obviously not used. No one other than the nominator recommends deletion. (non-admin closure) jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 14:25, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chandini Sreedharan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She married her boyfriend secretly, who was a crew member of a TV reality show in which she participated, since her parents strongly opposed their relationship. However, Kerala High Court has legally allowed the marriage under the special marriage act, by rejecting the Habeas Corpus filed by her mother, Rajini. She also has one daughter.many times i have been deleted this postion but it is restoring again Sadiqkhan79 (talk) 16:36, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per G7. Nominator is also page creator. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 16:41, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 16:50, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 16:50, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the nominator has stated an invalid rationale for deletion, citing no Wikipedia policies or guidelines. Long standing article with evidence of notability presented. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:18, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Actress who was the main heroine in at least 4 major films - easy WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR pass. Content disputes should not be solved by starting a deletion discussion, but must be discussed in the talk page. Jupitus Smart 09:16, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.